In today's Smoke evaluation, GPT-5.5's material constraint score dropped from 65.80 to 50.60 (down 15.2 points), while its code execution score rose from 45.00 to 75.00 (up 30 points), lifting its main leaderboard score from 54.36 to 64.02 (up 9.7 points).
On 2026-08-15, the YZ Index Smoke quick test covered 9 models, with Claude Opus 4.7 ranking first for the day at 82.55 points. Smoke is a daily 10-question quick test for observing short-term signals and is not equivalent to the Full weekly ranking conclusions.
The August 14, 2026 YZ Index Smoke quick test covered 11 models, with Claude Opus 4.7 ranking first at 72.21 points. As a daily 10-question quick test, Smoke is suited for observing short-term signals and is not equivalent to the Full weekly ranking conclusions.
Gemini 2.5 Pro's main leaderboard score fell 9.1 points to 79.41 in today's Smoke evaluation, driven by a 29.6-point plunge in the code execution dimension, while the material constraint dimension rose 15.9 points.
On 2026-08-13, the YZ Index Smoke quick test covered 11 models, with GPT-5.5 and GPT-o3 tying for first place at 97.25 points. The Smoke test is a daily 10-question quick check for short-term signals, not equivalent to the Full weekly ranking.
In WDCD v3.1 pilot testing, Doubao Pro climbed 13.8 points over Run #271 while GPT-o3 fell 11.6 points, triggering a major reshuffle in the commitment-keeping rankings. Grok 4 leads the Top 5 with 94.80 points, followed by Gemini 3.1 Pro at 91.30.
In the WDCD v3.1 five-scenario evaluation, the Business Rules track proved the hardest, with qwen3-max scoring only 1.55/4, while claude-opus-4.7 fell to 2/4 in Resource Constraints. No model maintained consistently high scores across all five constraint scenarios.
In the WDCD v3.1 pilot, the average performance of 11 models on 8 v2 anchor questions exhibited a clear three-round degradation: R1 confirmation rate 100%, R2 resistance rate 86%, and R3 integrity rate only 59.1%. This result comes solely from v2 anchor questions and is unrelated to the 0-100 four-component scoring of v3 multi-round questions.
In the WDCD v3.1 compliance test, Grok 4 ranked first with 94.80 points while Qwen3 Max placed last with 69.20 points, a 25.6-point gap. The R3 pressure round proved decisive in shaping final rankings, with notable divergence in constraint retention under escalating pressure.
GLM-4.6 scored 79.38 on today's Smoke evaluation main leaderboard, with code execution falling 12.5 points to 62.50 while material constraints reached a perfect 100.00. The integrity rating improved from fail to pass, with the fluctuation most likely driven by random question selection.
The 2026-08-12 YZ Index Smoke quick test covered 11 models, with Grok 4 ranking first with 98.41 points. Notable score fluctuations were observed across multiple models, and GLM-4.6's integrity rating dropped to Fail.
Doubao Pro's Smoke evaluation today saw complete data loss across all five dimensions due to an API failure/timeout, triggering an automatic re-run and exclusion from this edition's main leaderboard.
In today's Smoke evaluation, GLM-4.6's integrity rating dropped from pass to fail, and its Task Expression score fell sharply from 45.00 to 20.00. The main leaderboard score rose from 61.25 to 74.00.
The 2026-08-11 YZ Index Smoke quick test covered 10 models, with Gemini 3.1 Pro taking first place at 94.74 points. Smoke is a daily 10-question quick test for observing short-term signals, not equivalent to the Full weekly ranking conclusion.
On 2026-08-10, the YZ Index Smoke quick test covered 10 models, with DeepSeek V4 Pro ranking first with a main index score of 87.2. Most models exhibited stronger code execution than material constraint performance.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 rose 8.8 points to 83.72 on the WDCD v3.1 benchmark while Doubao Pro fell 16 points, as the evaluation begins to differentiate models' true commitment boundaries under multi-round progressive pressure.
In the WDCD v3.1 five-scenario benchmark, data boundaries scored the lowest of all scenarios, with 11 models averaging just around 2.8. doubao-pro was the only model below 2 points at 1.4/4, while gpt-o3 and grok-4 tied at 3.6/4.
In a sample limited to eight v2 anchor questions, 11 models recorded 34 complete R3 collapses out of 275 tests. Doubao Pro showed a 32% R3 collapse rate, while Grok 4 had zero collapses, revealing a sharp decline from high initial confirmation to weak adherence under third-round pressure.
In the WDCD v3.1 compliance test, Grok 4 ranked first with 91.04 points while Doubao Pro placed last with 58.00 points, a 33.04-point gap between the top and bottom.
Qwen3 Max's main leaderboard score in the Smoke evaluation fell from 96.04 to 85.82 in a single day, a decline of 10.2 points. The material constraint dimension accounted for most of the drop, falling 21.5 points, while code execution remained nearly unchanged.
