World Cup Teams Are in a Race for AI Dominance

of data being recorded at this summer’s World Cup is unprecedented. FIFA, the tournament organiser, will track around 150 million data points per match. Inside the ball alone, sensors monitoring IMUs (Inertial Measurement Units) will log 500 movements per second to trace the ball’s motion.

If that sounds excessive, Patrick Lucey can go further. “The thing with soccer is that there are more permutations (in a game) than there are atoms in the universe,” he says.

Lucey is chief scientist at Stats Perform, the data and AI company whose work underpins almost the entire global soccer ecosystem. Their statistics are used across every aspect of the modern game. It powers player scouting and multimillion-dollar fees for player transfers, helps coaching staff choose tactics and lineups, and devises corner and free kick routines. Players use it to negotiate contracts, broadcasters to entertain.

AI now enables data to be collected across matches around the globe like never before, and staff inside teams are pushing boundaries to crunch that data at unprecedented speed. At the World Cup, swathes of information will be manipulated and analysed, by humans and AI, to find a cutting edge.

complete guide to the 2026 FIFA World Cup.

Teams at this year’s Cup will also have access to a bespoke AI agent powered by Lenovo. It’s FIFA’s attempt to level the playing field. Whether or not it will be enough to do so is another matter.

“The data’s fine-grain, multi-agent, adversarial. What we do in sport is most similar to autonomous vehicles—you’re looking at trajectories,” says Lucey. “If you think of one team, there are 10 factorial permutations, just in terms of ordering players. If you include the opposition, it just explodes.”

Even smaller nations have found innovative ways to leverage technology. Curaçao, a Dutch Caribbean island with a population of roughly 159,000, became the smallest nation ever to qualify for a World Cup at this tournament after they used their own data and technology for “diaspora tracking”: mapping parentage, identifying eligible players, and using geospatial data to plan scouting trips and organise trials.

“Only one player of the Curaçao 26 was actually born on the island of Curaçao,” says Alex Stewart, chief executive of data-driven sports consultancy Analytics FC. “The rest of them were born in the Netherlands.”

Another growing use of data and AI in national federations is manager selection. Tools can analyse the pool of realistic squad options and identify managers whose tactical strengths best suit them. Teams can further use AI to help shape squad composition ahead of a tournament, based on group-stage opponents.

England are using AI for penalty analysis, knowing a penalty shoot-out can knock them out. What once took five days—analysing every penalty taker for an opponent—can now likely be done in five hours, the Football Association’s head of performance insights and analysis told the BBC.

Marcelo Bielsa, the Uruguay manager, once said when he was in charge at Premier League side Leeds United that his staff spent around 300 hours analysing an upcoming team. “We can do this automatically,” Lucey says. He shows a video of red and blue dots moving around a pitch chasing a yellow ball. Analysts can ask questions—how often a move has led to shots or goals, all the other times it occurred—each one revealing a fresh layer of information.

“You can compare this situation today with access to the web,” says Jan Wendt, cofounder and CEO of PLAIER, an AI platform working with clubs and national teams. Both British Airways and Amazon built websites in the early days of the internet. One became an information and airline ticketing platform, the other changed commerce globally, Wendt says. AI has a similar spread, changing both routine tasks and whole industries. Or, in the case of soccer, sports franchises.

But AI tools and the staff required to build and operate them are expensive. Not all countries have the necessary resources. Wendt believes working with already established external companies, like his own, should be seen as a more efficient option for smaller nations.

Another challenge is that more data can make an analyst’s job harder. Their role is to distil vast amounts of information into a handful of useful insights for a coach or player.

“You don't want to say, ‘OK, now we can use all this cool stuff here's a 47-page dossier on your opposition fullback,’” says Stewart. “The analyst’s job is in some ways easier because there’s more information. But it’s harder because there’s more information, so there’s a skill in boiling it down.”

Technology can power match analysis and preparation for teams that couldn’t previously compete with nations employing large scouting and analytics departments. But does that mean the issue will now be that they can’t compete against the large teams of computer scientists and analysts?

Will the data gap between wealthier and poorer nations widen so significantly that it distorts competition in a tournament where the odds are already stacked against smaller countries?

FIFA is concerned enough that it has built a bespoke AI agent, Football AI Pro, and is making it available to every nation at the World Cup for the first time during this tournament.

The agent resembles a ChatGPT-style interface, where coaches can type questions and unlock information about their next opponents. Matches are recreated in 3D, allowing analysis from previously impossible angles. Everything is quantifiable, from where players pass and run to how they attack and defend to the shots they take and the goals they score.

“We see it as our goal, and even our task, to provide technology to all the teams, so that everyone has access and can use it in a simple way without having additional experts on the team, because not everyone can afford it,” says Johannes Holzmüller, FIFA’s director of innovation.

Whether this closes the gulf between a nation with a bare-bones data department and, say, the England national team, which employs in-house software developers, data scientists, and analysts, powered by external AI tools, is debatable. “That’s the minimum we can do,” Holzmüller adds. “We see this gap where some teams are using technology and data more than others.”

The future of data, AI, and soccer is, quite literally, predicting the future. “The next step is to do long-term forecasting,” Lucey says, believing they will reach a point where counterfactual analysis will enable them to recommend players to rest to maximise the probability of success.

Will FIFA have to step in and restrict nations to using only FIFA-approved AI tools?

“That’s a big question,” Holzmüller says. “If this will be then somehow regulated, that’s not for today to answer, but [AI] will play a big role in the future.”